Arcametric
Time savings analysis
Illustrative planning model

Documentation time · Illustrative model

How structured capture can reduce documentation work.

Model how structured capture can reduce repeated transcription and manual report assembly across a full treatment series.

8.41.1
hours of documentation per series, manual vs structured
292 hrs
modeled documentation time avoided each year, at 40 patients
7.3 wks
of modeled work time saved

1. Documentation can consume roughly a third of the working day.

Behavioral-health clinicians can spend a large share of their working hours on documentation and administrative work.

The cited surveys put documentation near 35 percent of working hours and administrative work at roughly 16 minutes per patient encounter. Those figures establish the manual baseline used in this model. The question is how much repeated documentation work can be reduced when information is captured in structured fields and reused for later reports and review.

2. Structured capture can reduce repeated documentation steps.

Across one full treatment series, modeled documentation time falls from 8.4 hours to 1.1.

Manual 505 min · 8.4 hrs Arcametric 65 min · 1.1 hrs
Documentation minutes per treatment series (modeled).

How to read this. This is an illustrative planning model, not a measured product result. The manual times are drawn from the sources cited in the model. The Arcametric estimates assume structured fields reduce repeated entry and that supported reports and exports reduce manual assembly. Every clinic should validate the assumptions against its own workflow.

Nine documentation tasks across one interventional mental health treatment series. Times are per task, in minutes.

#Documentation taskManual (min)Arcametric (min)Saved (min)Source
1Pre-session baseline screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ACE, PCL-5): paper plus EHR entry28523APA Practice Guidelines; Eleos Health 2024
2Informed consent documentation: paper, signed form, scanned to EHR15213Standard clinical intake benchmarks
3Dosing session vitals log (every 15 min, 7-hr session, 28 readings): paper plus transcription42834CMS time-motion study analog
4Adverse event documentation: narrative note plus manual MedDRA code lookup22319IQVIA MedDRA coding study 2023: avg 22 min per event
5Post-session integration notes: SOAP format in EHR free-text20713Eleos Health: avg 16 to 20 min post-session notes
6Clinical outcomes compilation for insurance: manual chart review plus PDF creation45144CMS billing burden estimates; APA admin surveys
7Audit and compliance export: multi-source document assembly90189Expert estimate: 1.5 hr minimum for manual assembly
8Preparing a de-identified research export60159Shared Arcametric records exclude patient names; study-specific de-identification review may still be required
9Drug interaction reference documentation15114Illustrative reference-lookup assumption; Arcametric is documentation and reference support, not clinical decision support
Full treatment series (3 dosing sessions per patient)505 min
(8.4 hrs)
65 min
(1.1 hrs)
440 min
(7.3 hrs)

Intake tasks (1 and 2) are counted once per series, dosing tasks (3 to 5) across three sessions, and export and compliance tasks (6 to 9) once per series.

3. The model translates to about seven workweeks a year.

For a solo practitioner treating 40 patients a year, the model implies about 292 hours not spent on the modeled documentation tasks, roughly 7.3 full-time workweeks. How that time is ultimately used depends on the practice.

The modeled gain is time, not a dollar figure or a clinical result. The estimate assumes structured capture reduces repeated transcription and manual report assembly; actual savings will depend on the clinic's workflow.

4. A planning model, not a guarantee.

What this isWhat this is not
A planning model of documentation time, built from published sources and structured-capture designNot a guarantee of realized time savings. Each clinic should validate against its own workflow.
A count of minutes spent documenting the arc of careNot a claim about clinical outcomes. Arcametric documents and surfaces; it does not direct care.

See it on a synthetic, de-identified record.

The fastest way to judge the model is to watch structured capture replace manual steps on a synthetic, de-identified record. Watch the on-demand demo or contact Arcametric for a deeper review.

Contact: hello@arcametric.com · arcametric.com

Arcametric

Arcametric
arcametric.com
© 2026 Arcametric